A Revised Exposition of the Methodology for Testing Payments Systems Risk
|Author(s):||Peter Docherty & Gehong Wang|
|Date of publication:||June 2009|
|Working paper number:||159|
Financial economists and central bankers have been concerned for some time about the possibility of financial contagion spreading from bank to bank via interbank exposures within the payments system. The initial study of payments system risk was undertaken by Humphrey (1986) who found significant risk in the U.S. Fedwire system in the mid 1980s. Subsequent studies by Angelini, Maresca & Russo (1996), Kuussaari (1996), Northcott (2002), Furfine (2003) and Wang & Docherty (2006) have found, however, little evidence of systemic risk in the payments systems of Italy, Finland, Canada, Australia and in the U.S. inter-bank market. All of these studies employ a methodology in which the effects of a simulated failure at one institution on other institutions are examined and quantified but no formal statement of the simulation process is usually provided. One exception to this is the study by Wang & Docherty (2006) but it is possible to further refine and sharpen the exposition offered in that study. The objective of this short paper is simply to provide such an updated and refined exposition of the default simulation methodology used in payments system risk research.
|Paper:||Download (Format: PDF, Size: 247 Kb)|
|Known citations:||Docherty, P. and Wang, G, 2010, "Using Synthetic Data to Evaluate the Impact of RTGS on Systemic Risk in the Australian Payments System", Journal of Financial Stability, 6(2), 103-117.|